اولا با مقایسه شکل لرزه های زلزله و انفجارهای فراوان زیر زمینی قبلی الان با دقت بالای 99% میشه انفجار اتمی زیر زمینی را تشخیص داد و اگر کشوری در هر عمقی انفجار انجام داده باشه کسی تو دنیا لرزه های انفجار هسته ایرا با لرزه های بمب اشتباه نمیگیره! ثانیا عمیق ترین حفاری که بشر اون هم برای تحقیقات زمین شناسی انجام داده (Кольская сверхглубокая скважина СГ-3) یا (The Kola Superdeep Borehole SG-3) تو روسیه بوده که سال 1989 رسید به عمق 12262 متری! یه حفاری علمی دیگه هم (German Continental Deep Drilling Program) از سال 1987 شروع کرد سال 1995 (بعد از 8 سال) رسیدند به عمق 9101 متری (تو اون عمق دما بالاتر 260 درجه سانتیگراد میشه یعنی آب به چاه تزریق بشه تبدیل به بخار میشه) تو حفاری چاههای نفت الان به چاه های با عمق 4500 تا 6000 متر میگن چاه های عمیق (Deep Wells)، به 6000 تا 9000 میگن (Super-deep Wells) و از 9000 متر بیشتر میگن (Ultra-deep Wells) که خود رسیدن به این عمق 9 کیلومتری کار هر کسی نیست و خلاصه این که هر کشوری مثل مثلا چین به عمق 10 کیلومتری برسه خود این که تونسته تا این عمق حفاری کنه را جشن میگیره!!! حالا این نویسنده احمق نوشته: Another report has claimed that the earthquake in Iran could be an underground nuclear test because its center was at a depth of ONLY 10 km from the ground!!! ثالثا تستهای زیر زمینی یا (Underground nuclear weapons testing) عمق چاهشون از 5 متر در سال 1951 شروع شد، سال 1955 رسید به 20 متر، سال 1957 رسید به 150 تا 250 متر- عمق چاهی که 18 می 1974 (Operation Smiling Buddha) یا (Pokhran-I nuclear test) هندوستان توش اتجام شد هم 107 متر بود اونوقت یه احمق به اسم طاهر قریشی نوشته ایران 7-8 سال حفاری کرده 10 کیلومتر چاه کنده توش تست هسته ای انجام داده و خیلی ها هم باز نشر میکنند!!!

Pakistan's A.Q. Khan: My Nuclear Manifesto By A. Q. Khan On 5/16/2011 at 6:00 AM EDT https://www.newsweek.com/pakistans-aq-khan-my-nuclear-manifesto-67529 Don't overlook the fact that no nuclear-capable country has been subjected to aggression or occupied, or had its borders redrawn. Had Iraq and Libya been nuclear powers, they wouldn't have been destroyed in the way we have seen recently. If we had had nuclear capability before 1971, we would not have lost half of our country—present-day Bangladesh—after disgraceful defeat. There is a total misconception about the money spent on our nuclear program. When we started, our budget was just $10 million per year, increasing to $20 million per year when at full capacity, including all salaries, transport, medical care, housing, utilities, and purchases of technical equipment and materials. This is but half the cost of a modern fighter aircraft. The propaganda about spending exorbitant sums on the nuclear program circulated by ignorant, often foreign-paid, Pakistanis has no substance.

Newsweek - World Pakistan's A.Q. Khan: My Nuclear Manifesto By A. Q. Khan On 5/16/11 at 6:00 AM EDT https://www.newsweek.com/pakistans-aq-khan-my-nuclear-manifesto-67529 Pakistan's nuclear program has always been a target for Western propaganda and false accusations. I would like to make it clear that it was an Indian nuclear explosion in May 1974 that prompted our nuclear program, motivating me to return to Pakistan to help create a credible nuclear deterrent and save my country from Indian nuclear blackmail. After 15 years in Europe with invaluable experience in enrichment technology, I came to Pakistan in December 1975 and was given the task of producing nuclear weapons by then–prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. On Dec. 10, 1984, I informed Gen. Zia-ul-Haq that we could explode a device at a week's notice, whenever he so desired. We achieved credible nuclear capacity by the second half of the '80s, and the delivery system was perfected in the early '90s. For a country that couldn't produce bicycle chains to have become a nuclear and missile power within a short span—and in the teeth of Western opposition—was quite a feat. The question of how many weapons are required for credible deterrence against India is purely academic. India is engaged in a massive program to cope with the nonexistent threat posed by China and in order to become a superpower...

Newsweek - World Pakistan's A.Q. Khan: My Nuclear Manifesto By A. Q. Khan On 5/16/11 at 6:00 AM EDT https://www.newsweek.com/pakistans-aq-khan-my-nuclear-manifesto-67529 Pakistan's nuclear program has always been a target for Western propaganda and false accusations. I would like to make it clear that it was an Indian nuclear explosion in May 1974 that prompted our nuclear program, motivating me to return to Pakistan to help create a credible nuclear deterrent and save my country from Indian nuclear blackmail. After 15 years in Europe with invaluable experience in enrichment technology, I came to Pakistan in December 1975 and was given the task of producing nuclear weapons by then–prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. On Dec. 10, 1984, I informed Gen. Zia-ul-Haq that we could explode a device at a week's notice, whenever he so desired. We achieved credible nuclear capacity by the second half of the '80s, and the delivery system was perfected in the early '90s. For a country that couldn't produce bicycle chains to have become a nuclear and missile power within a short span—and in the teeth of Western opposition—was quite a feat. The question of how many weapons are required for credible deterrence against India is purely academic. India is engaged in a massive program to cope with the nonexistent threat posed by China and in order to become a superpower. India doesn't need more than five weapons to hurt us badly, and we wouldn't need more than 10 to return the favor. That is why there has been no war between us for the past 40 years. I have little knowledge of the present status of our program, as I left Kahuta, Pakistan's main nuclear facility, 10 years ago. As the pioneer of the program, my guess is that our efforts have been to perfect the design, reduce the size of the weapons to fit on the warheads of our missile systems, and ensure a fail-safe system for their storage. A country needs sufficient weapons to be stored at different places in order to have a second-strike capability. But there is a limit to these requirements. Don't overlook the fact that no nuclear-capable country has been subjected to aggression or occupied, or had its borders redrawn. Had Iraq and Libya been nuclear powers, they wouldn't have been destroyed in the way we have seen recently. If we had had nuclear capability before 1971, we would not have lost half of our country—present-day Bangladesh—after disgraceful defeat. There is a total misconception about the money spent on our nuclear program. When we started, our budget was just $10 million per year, increasing to $20 million per year when at full capacity, including all salaries, transport, medical care, housing, utilities, and purchases of technical equipment and materials. This is but half the cost of a modern fighter aircraft. The propaganda about spending exorbitant sums on the nuclear program circulated by ignorant, often foreign-paid, Pakistanis has no substance. India and Pakistan understand the old principle that ensured peace in the Cold War: mutually assured destruction. The two can't afford a nuclear war, and despite our saber rattling, there is no chance of a nuclear war that would send us both back to the Stone Age. What pains me is that we gave Pakistan nuclear capability for its self-esteem and deterrence against adversaries. With our sovereignty thus secure, I urged various governments to concentrate on development to raise the people's standard of living. Unfortunately, successive incompetent and ignorant rulers never bothered to work on the greater national interest. We are far worse off now than we were 20, or even 40, years ago when we were subjected to embargoes. Our nuclear-weapons program has given us an impregnable defense, and we are forced to maintain this deterrence until our differences with India are resolved. That would lead to a new era of peace for both countries. I hope I live to see Pakistan and India living harmoniously in the same way as the once bitter enemies Germany and France live today.

▂▂▂▃▅▇█▓▒░ [ پرسش کلاسی شمارۀ 4] ░▒▓█▇▅▃▂▂▂ نام درس : مسائل اقتصاد سياسي انرژي در ايران (یکشنبه‌ها) تاریخ برگزاری امتحان: 1403/07/22 مدت: 15 دقیقه 1- تفاوت اصلی حرفهای مرحوم دکتر عسگرخانی را با حرفهای مرحوم (Abdul Qadeer Khan) در مقالۀ Newsweek - World Pakistan's A.Q. Khan: My Nuclear Manifesto By A. Q. Khan On 5/16/11 at 6:00 AM EDT https://www.newsweek.com/pakistans-aq-khan-my-nuclear-manifesto-67529 بنویسید. ⚠️ نام، نام خانوادگی، شمارۀ دانشجویی و تاریخ برگزاری هر امتحان را حتما روی برگه‌های که تحویل می‌دهید بنویسید. وقتی من با تاخیر میام یعنی یک ربع شما سر ساعت 10:00 شروع شده و شما دارید روی امتحان کار میکنید تا برسم.

How a Nuclear Reactor Works @PhysicsHigh 11:35 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBeu_-z4_BM

Nuclear Power - How it works opgvideos 2:51 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf4m9ES4dPY

Nuclear Fission; Splitting the Atom for Beginners: from fizzics.org Fizzics Organisation 8:41 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgZDXxux9s4

Nuclear Fission 8:58 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pY5HeZpNr8

What Is Nuclear Fission? | Radioactivity | Physics | FuseSchool FuseSchool - Global Education 2:58 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D91T-B-PVE0

Nuclear fission | Physics | Khan Academy @khanacademy 10:27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jDFqpoTgDo

Nuclear Reactor - Understanding how it works | Physics Elearnin Elearnin 4:51 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U6Nzcv9Vws