چون تو بیشتر فیلمهای منتشر شده میزان اصابت موشکهای ایران به هدف این اندازه قابل شمارش نیستند و فیلمهای جعلی مربوط به مقابله با موشکهای سایر کشورها هم زیاده خیلی از قربانیان جنگها شناختی از فردا باور میکنند که اسراییل 300% تا 800% موشکهای ایران را زده! به هر حال تو این فیلم هدف ( בסיס נבטים) هست که پایگاه هوایی 28ام اسرائیل میشه - (בסיס) یعنی پایگاه و (נבטים) یعنی "رویش‌ها" یا "جوانه‌ها". اگر دقیق بشمرید متوجه میشد که میزان اصابت به وضوح بیش از 90 درصد هست. اما این حملۀ ملایم در واقع پاسخ ایران به "ترور در تهران" و دلیل متوقف شدنش هم فرصت دادن به دشمن برای اصلاح محاسبات اشتباه قبلی بوده... حالا دیگر به نظر میرسد که این ایران است که قصد دارد پای اسرائیل را به جنگ بکشاند و این نتانیاهو است که باید باهوش باشد و وارد تله جنگ نشود!!!

این را هم که تسنیم منتشر کرده اصابت به یک نقطه را خوب نشون داده... فعلا پایگاه های 6ام (בָּסִיס חֵיל-הַאֲוִויר חֲצֵרִים) یا (Hatzerim) و 28ام (בסיס נבטים) یا (Nevatim) بعد از این حملات از سرویس خارج شدند که برای شروع بد نیست.

سی ان ان: یکی از اهداف مورد اصلبت قرار گرفته مقر موساد در تل آویو بوده است. (البته کلی سر و صدا کردند که ساختمان اطرافش جمعیت هست و ... اما ساختمان موساد هدف نبوده به فضای سبز محوطه ای که نزدیک ساختمان هست یه شلیک هشدار شده).

نماز جمعه با جمعیتی برگزار شد که ده تا مصلای فعلی هم جای همشون نمیشد، همه مسئولین کشوری و لشگری اومدند نشستند سه ساعت پخش زنده توسط تمام رسانه های جهان داشتیم آقا هم که معمولا بعد از نماز جمعه نماز عصر را خودشون نمیخوندند این بار نماز عصر را هم خودشون وایستادند خوندند و بعد از نماز هم با همه خوش و بش کردند تا مشخص بشه عجله ای ندارند، وزیر خارجه با هواپیما رفت بیروت ببینیم آدمکشهای بی عقلی که همۀ برق کشور جعلیشون را سه تا نیروگاه و تمام سوختشون را چهار تا پالایشگاه تامین میکنه چقدر برای این که تو عصر حجر زندگی کنند عجله دارند- اما فضای مجازی همچنان به توانایی بچه خر کردن امیدوار هست...

▂▂▂▃▅▇█▓▒░ [ پرسش کلاسی شمارۀ 3] ░▒▓█▇▅▃▂▂▂ نام درس : مسائل اقتصاد سياسي انرژي در ايران (یکشنبه‌ها) تاریخ برگزاری امتحان: 1403/07/15 مدت: 15 دقیقه 1- روشی که برنامه ها بلد هستند را یا یک مثال ساده توضیح دهید. 2- روش آماده کردن یک غذای ساده را هم توضیح دهید. ⚠️ نام، نام خانوادگی، شمارۀ دانشجویی و تاریخ برگزاری هر امتحان را حتما روی برگه‌های که تحویل می‌دهید بنویسید.

یه سایت هندی این چرندیات را گفته اما کلش را بخونید میبینید که چرته: Did Iran conduct underground nuclear test on Saturday night? ‘Measured’ earthquake in region suggests… The intensity was 4.5 on the Richter scale. Home Viral Did Iran conduct underground nuclear test on Saturday night? ‘Measured’ earthqua Published: October 6, 2024 8:33 PM IST By Tahir Qureshi | Edited by Tahir Qureshi New Delhi: An earthquake of moderate intensity occurred in Iran and Israel on Saturday night, October 5. Strangely enough, both the countries experienced the earthquake at a marginal difference in the timing. In such a situation, it is being speculated whether Iran has conducted its nuclear test. The earthquake occurred in the Aradan city of Semnan province in Iran. Its intensity was 4.5 on the Richter scale. The earthquake occurred at around 10:45 pm local time and its epicentre was at a depth of only 10 kilometers from the ground. The tremors were felt in Tehran which is 110 kilometers away from the epicenter of the earthquake, reports the US Geological Survey. Earthquake reported in Israel shortly after Iran A few minutes later, an earthquake was reported from Israel. According to the report of the European Mediterranean Seismic Center (EMSC), this earthquake occurred around 12 o’clock but its intensity remained very low. Given the intense state of conflict between Iran and Israel, people have started linking the earthquakes in these two countries with Iran’s nuclear tests on social media. There have been speculations in many reports that it was not an earthquake rather Iran conducted underground nuclear tests due to which a shock was felt in both the countries. Nuclear test or earthquake? A report claimed that the earthquake in Iran occurred very close to the nuclear power plant, so it cannot be said whether the shock was due to an earthquake or a nuclear test. Another report has claimed that the earthquake in Iran could be an underground nuclear test because its center was at a depth of only 10 km from the ground. In such a situation, the speculation about Iran’s nuclear test has deepened.

اولا با مقایسه شکل لرزه های زلزله و انفجارهای فراوان زیر زمینی قبلی الان با دقت بالای 99% میشه انفجار اتمی زیر زمینی را تشخیص داد و اگر کشوری در هر عمقی انفجار انجام داده باشه کسی تو دنیا لرزه های انفجار هسته ایرا با لرزه های بمب اشتباه نمیگیره! ثانیا عمیق ترین حفاری که بشر اون هم برای تحقیقات زمین شناسی انجام داده (Кольская сверхглубокая скважина СГ-3) یا (The Kola Superdeep Borehole SG-3) تو روسیه بوده که سال 1989 رسید به عمق 12262 متری! یه حفاری علمی دیگه هم (German Continental Deep Drilling Program) از سال 1987 شروع کرد سال 1995 (بعد از 8 سال) رسیدند به عمق 9101 متری (تو اون عمق دما بالاتر 260 درجه سانتیگراد میشه یعنی آب به چاه تزریق بشه تبدیل به بخار میشه) تو حفاری چاههای نفت الان به چاه های با عمق 4500 تا 6000 متر میگن چاه های عمیق (Deep Wells)، به 6000 تا 9000 میگن (Super-deep Wells) و از 9000 متر بیشتر میگن (Ultra-deep Wells) که خود رسیدن به این عمق 9 کیلومتری کار هر کسی نیست و خلاصه این که هر کشوری مثل مثلا چین به عمق 10 کیلومتری برسه خود این که تونسته تا این عمق حفاری کنه را جشن میگیره!!! حالا این نویسنده احمق نوشته: Another report has claimed that the earthquake in Iran could be an underground nuclear test because its center was at a depth of ONLY 10 km from the ground!!! ثالثا تستهای زیر زمینی یا (Underground nuclear weapons testing) عمق چاهشون از 5 متر در سال 1951 شروع شد، سال 1955 رسید به 20 متر، سال 1957 رسید به 150 تا 250 متر- عمق چاهی که 18 می 1974 (Operation Smiling Buddha) یا (Pokhran-I nuclear test) هندوستان توش اتجام شد هم 107 متر بود اونوقت یه احمق به اسم طاهر قریشی نوشته ایران 7-8 سال حفاری کرده 10 کیلومتر چاه کنده توش تست هسته ای انجام داده و خیلی ها هم باز نشر میکنند!!!

Pakistan's A.Q. Khan: My Nuclear Manifesto By A. Q. Khan On 5/16/2011 at 6:00 AM EDT https://www.newsweek.com/pakistans-aq-khan-my-nuclear-manifesto-67529 Don't overlook the fact that no nuclear-capable country has been subjected to aggression or occupied, or had its borders redrawn. Had Iraq and Libya been nuclear powers, they wouldn't have been destroyed in the way we have seen recently. If we had had nuclear capability before 1971, we would not have lost half of our country—present-day Bangladesh—after disgraceful defeat. There is a total misconception about the money spent on our nuclear program. When we started, our budget was just $10 million per year, increasing to $20 million per year when at full capacity, including all salaries, transport, medical care, housing, utilities, and purchases of technical equipment and materials. This is but half the cost of a modern fighter aircraft. The propaganda about spending exorbitant sums on the nuclear program circulated by ignorant, often foreign-paid, Pakistanis has no substance.

Newsweek - World Pakistan's A.Q. Khan: My Nuclear Manifesto By A. Q. Khan On 5/16/11 at 6:00 AM EDT https://www.newsweek.com/pakistans-aq-khan-my-nuclear-manifesto-67529 Pakistan's nuclear program has always been a target for Western propaganda and false accusations. I would like to make it clear that it was an Indian nuclear explosion in May 1974 that prompted our nuclear program, motivating me to return to Pakistan to help create a credible nuclear deterrent and save my country from Indian nuclear blackmail. After 15 years in Europe with invaluable experience in enrichment technology, I came to Pakistan in December 1975 and was given the task of producing nuclear weapons by then–prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. On Dec. 10, 1984, I informed Gen. Zia-ul-Haq that we could explode a device at a week's notice, whenever he so desired. We achieved credible nuclear capacity by the second half of the '80s, and the delivery system was perfected in the early '90s. For a country that couldn't produce bicycle chains to have become a nuclear and missile power within a short span—and in the teeth of Western opposition—was quite a feat. The question of how many weapons are required for credible deterrence against India is purely academic. India is engaged in a massive program to cope with the nonexistent threat posed by China and in order to become a superpower...

Newsweek - World Pakistan's A.Q. Khan: My Nuclear Manifesto By A. Q. Khan On 5/16/11 at 6:00 AM EDT https://www.newsweek.com/pakistans-aq-khan-my-nuclear-manifesto-67529 Pakistan's nuclear program has always been a target for Western propaganda and false accusations. I would like to make it clear that it was an Indian nuclear explosion in May 1974 that prompted our nuclear program, motivating me to return to Pakistan to help create a credible nuclear deterrent and save my country from Indian nuclear blackmail. After 15 years in Europe with invaluable experience in enrichment technology, I came to Pakistan in December 1975 and was given the task of producing nuclear weapons by then–prime minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. On Dec. 10, 1984, I informed Gen. Zia-ul-Haq that we could explode a device at a week's notice, whenever he so desired. We achieved credible nuclear capacity by the second half of the '80s, and the delivery system was perfected in the early '90s. For a country that couldn't produce bicycle chains to have become a nuclear and missile power within a short span—and in the teeth of Western opposition—was quite a feat. The question of how many weapons are required for credible deterrence against India is purely academic. India is engaged in a massive program to cope with the nonexistent threat posed by China and in order to become a superpower. India doesn't need more than five weapons to hurt us badly, and we wouldn't need more than 10 to return the favor. That is why there has been no war between us for the past 40 years. I have little knowledge of the present status of our program, as I left Kahuta, Pakistan's main nuclear facility, 10 years ago. As the pioneer of the program, my guess is that our efforts have been to perfect the design, reduce the size of the weapons to fit on the warheads of our missile systems, and ensure a fail-safe system for their storage. A country needs sufficient weapons to be stored at different places in order to have a second-strike capability. But there is a limit to these requirements. Don't overlook the fact that no nuclear-capable country has been subjected to aggression or occupied, or had its borders redrawn. Had Iraq and Libya been nuclear powers, they wouldn't have been destroyed in the way we have seen recently. If we had had nuclear capability before 1971, we would not have lost half of our country—present-day Bangladesh—after disgraceful defeat. There is a total misconception about the money spent on our nuclear program. When we started, our budget was just $10 million per year, increasing to $20 million per year when at full capacity, including all salaries, transport, medical care, housing, utilities, and purchases of technical equipment and materials. This is but half the cost of a modern fighter aircraft. The propaganda about spending exorbitant sums on the nuclear program circulated by ignorant, often foreign-paid, Pakistanis has no substance. India and Pakistan understand the old principle that ensured peace in the Cold War: mutually assured destruction. The two can't afford a nuclear war, and despite our saber rattling, there is no chance of a nuclear war that would send us both back to the Stone Age. What pains me is that we gave Pakistan nuclear capability for its self-esteem and deterrence against adversaries. With our sovereignty thus secure, I urged various governments to concentrate on development to raise the people's standard of living. Unfortunately, successive incompetent and ignorant rulers never bothered to work on the greater national interest. We are far worse off now than we were 20, or even 40, years ago when we were subjected to embargoes. Our nuclear-weapons program has given us an impregnable defense, and we are forced to maintain this deterrence until our differences with India are resolved. That would lead to a new era of peace for both countries. I hope I live to see Pakistan and India living harmoniously in the same way as the once bitter enemies Germany and France live today.