Farrell, Henry; Newman, Abraham L., Drezner, Daniel W. (Edutors). The Uses and Abuses of Weaponized Interdependence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2021.

📖 Farrell, Henry; Newman, Abraham L., Drezner, Daniel W. (Edutors). The Uses and Abuses of Weaponized Interdependence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2021.

Pavelec, Sterling Michael. The Military-Industrial Complex and American Society. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC., 2010.

📖 Pavelec, Sterling Michael. The Military-Industrial Complex and American Society. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LLC., 2010.

متن کامل مصاحبه ای که بخشهایی ازش توسط رجانیوز و صاحب خبران و دیگران 9 فروردين 1403 نشر / بازنشر شده این 👆 بوده. خودم دقیق چک نکردم کجاهاش منتشر شده و کجاهاش نشده اما خب مثلا سئوال 3 و جوابش حذف شده. چرا؟ چون این مدل سوال جوابها بیشتر جنبۀ مشورتی دارند، به هر حال کامل چیزی که 9 فروردین منتشر شده این بوده.

هر جاش دوطرفه نبود بنویسید بررسی میشه موضوع کلاس ما این نیست وقت هم کم داریم.

Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex" Speech Origins and Significance US National Archives 3:16 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y

Dwight D. Eisenhower - Farewell Speech - Address to the Nation - Military Industrial Complex Warning (January 17, 1961) War and Military Documentaries 16:15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHDgsh6WPyc President Dwight D. Eisenhower's Farewell Address, famed for its reference to the "military-industrial complex," is one of the most famous speeches in American history. Its meaning has been analyzed and debated by historians ever since. President Eisenhower delivered the speech on January 17, 1961. https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/farewell-address

... A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction... This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence—economic, political, even spiritual—is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military–industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage -- balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration. The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only. IV. A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea. Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations. This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together. Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades. In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government. Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite.