eitaa logo
Class2
127 دنبال‌کننده
425 عکس
128 ویدیو
147 فایل
کتابهای کلاس
مشاهده در ایتا
دانلود
UNSC-Resolution 497 December 17, 1981 Security Council S/RES/497 (1981) 17 December 1981 Resolution 497 (1981) Adopted by the Security Council at its 2319th meeting on 17 December 1981 The Security Council, Having considered the letter of 14 December 1981 from the Permanent Representative of the Syrian Arab Republic contained in document S/14791, Reaffirming that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible, in accordance with the United Nations Charter, the principles of international law, and relevant Security Council resolutions, 1. Decides that the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights is null and void and without international legal effect; 2. Demands that Israel, the occupying Power, should rescind forthwith its decision; 3. Determines that all the provisions of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 continue to apply to the Syrian territory occupied by Israel since June 1967; 4. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Security Council on the implementation of this resolution within two weeks and decides that in the event of noncompliance by Israel, the Security Council would meet urgently, and not later than 5 January 1982, to consider taking appropriate measures in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
Class2
UNSC-Resolution 497 December 17, 1981 Security Council S/RES/497 (1981) 17 December 1981 Resolut
1. Strongly condemns the military attack by Israel in clear violation of the Charter of the United Nations and the norms of international conduct; ۱. حمله نظامی اسرائیل را که نقض آشکار منشور سازمان ملل متحد و هنجارهای رفتار بین‌المللی است، قویاً محکوم می‌کند؛ ——————--- 2. Calls upon Israel to refrain in the future from any such acts or threats thereof; ۲. از اسرائیل می‌خواهد که در آینده از هرگونه اقدام یا تهدید به چنین اقداماتی خودداری کند؛ ——————— 3. Further considers that the said attack constitutes a serious threat to the entire IAEA safeguards regime which is the foundation of the non-proliferation Treaty; ۳. همچنین معتقد است که حمله مذکور تهدیدی جدی برای کل رژیم پادمان‌های آژانس بین‌المللی انرژی اتمی است که اساس پیمان منع گسترش سلاح‌های هسته‌ای است؛ 4. Fully recognises the inalienable sovereign right of Iraq, and all other States, especially the developing countries, to establish programmes of technological and nuclear development to develop their economy and industry for peaceful purposes in accordance with their present and future needs and consistent with the internationally accepted objectives of preventing nuclear-weapons proliferation; ۴. حق حاکمیتی غیرقابل انکار عراق و سایر کشورها، به ویژه کشورهای در حال توسعه، را برای ایجاد برنامه‌های توسعه فناوری و هسته‌ای به منظور توسعه اقتصاد و صنعت خود برای اهداف صلح‌آمیز مطابق با نیازهای حال و آینده خود و سازگار با اهداف پذیرفته شده بین‌المللی در جلوگیری از گسترش سلاح‌های هسته‌ای، کاملاً به رسمیت می‌شناسد. ——————— 5. Calls upon Israel urgently to place its nuclear facilities under IAEA safeguards; ۵. از اسرائیل می‌خواهد که فوراً تأسیسات هسته‌ای خود را تحت پادمان‌های آژانس بین‌المللی انرژی اتمی قرار دهد؛
البته این چیز جدیدی نیست و کل بحث هم همیشه این هست که بلد نیستند قبل از ترم با هم بشینن توافق کنند که هزینه 32 ساعت اجاره یه کلاس چقدر میشه!!!
Avenhaus, Rudolf; Zartman, I. William (Editors). Diplomacy Games: Formal Models and International Negotiations. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2007.
DiplomacyGames2007(DrPirouz)o.pdf
حجم: 2.89M
📖 Avenhaus, Rudolf; Zartman, I. William (Editors). Diplomacy Games: Formal Models and International Negotiations. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 2007.
Class2
Avenhaus, Rudolf; Zartman, I. William (Editors). Diplomacy Games: Formal Models and International Ne
Normal form of the Chicken-type Game between the United States and the Soviet Union describing the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Arrows indicate preference directions; asterisks equilibria
Class2
Avenhaus, Rudolf; Zartman, I. William (Editors). Diplomacy Games: Formal Models and International Ne
Normal form of the Prisoner’s Dilemma-type Game between states I and II describing their arms race. Arrows indicate preference directions; the asterisk indicates the only equilibrium